| User | Post |
|
8:36 am February 25, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
Post edited 8:42 am – February 25, 2010 by RevGenetics
BotonyDoc,
I have been in contact with Albert Einstein, they assert no research, and asked Biotivia to take down this item off their website. I have the emails regarding this. The others are likely in the same boat as universities can have their funds and grants shot down if they are seen to be in league with a commercial interest.
Add to this the fact that BotonyDoc and BioResearcher share the same similarities (namely that they are anonomous posts…) then you can see how this post can be contributed by folks pushing false advertising.
Just because you say it, doesn't make it so.
That other post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher'.
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Dr. Sinclair, since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
|
|
|
5:53 am February 25, 2010
| Dan80
| | | |
| New Member | posts 1 |
|
|
BotanyDoc said:As a researcher in this field I can not comment on the Revgenitics brand but I can absolutely confirm that Biotivia's Transmax is being used in human clinical trials at Albert Einstein Med School, The Otawa Hospital (part of the Canadian Health System), Bologna University (Oldest and very respected University in the western world), University of Ferrara on Thalasemmia patients, and Harvard, yes that Harvard. Informal trials are also in progress at Univ. of Pittsburgh and the University of Texas as well as heaps of other research organisations. I know of no one using the Revgenitics brand in any human trials. Biotitivia resveratrol has also passed the Consumer Lab evaluations with very high ratings. I know James Betz and can vouch for his scientific credentials. He is clearly one of the experts in resveratrol.
That's refreshing to hear. I use Biotivia's products regularly and they're absolutely top notch in my experience. I trust those people and nowadays in an ocean of scammers that's a huge plus.
|
|
|
1:05 am February 25, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics stated that his product will be (is being?) used in a study on the elderly at the NIH. Longevinex and other brands are also being used in trials. Dr. Sinclair listed some of these in his e-book.
|
|
|
6:48 pm February 24, 2010
| BotanyDoc
| | | |
| New Member | posts 1 |
|
|
As a researcher in this field I can not comment on the Revgenitics brand but I can absolutely confirm that Biotivia's Transmax is being used in human clinical trials at Albert Einstein Med School, The Otawa Hospital (part of the Canadian Health System), Bologna University (Oldest and very respected University in the western world), University of Ferrara on Thalasemmia patients, and Harvard, yes that Harvard. Informal trials are also in progress at Univ. of Pittsburgh and the University of Texas as well as heaps of other research organisations. I know of no one using the Revgenitics brand in any human trials. Biotitivia resveratrol has also passed the Consumer Lab evaluations with very high ratings. I know James Betz and can vouch for his scientific credentials. He is clearly one of the experts in resveratrol.
|
|
|
9:02 pm February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
Post edited 9:11 pm – February 17, 2010 by FM2020
I was banned for calling attention to RevGenetics use of Dr. Sinclair's name, as he made it look like Dr. Sinclair recommended 250mg – 500mg of resveratrol right after Dr. Sinclair explicitly stated he only recommended up to 250mg. I still think RevGenetics should apologize for that on this forum and at the Imm Inst resveratrol forum.
RevGenetics is not asking Dr. Sinclair anything close to reasonable. "Dr. Sinclair, what do you think of Longevinex?" or "Dr. Sinclair, you took Longevinex for 3 to 4 years, and now it is believed you started taking SRT 501, so can you tell us what the differences are or what you now think of Longevinex?"
It isn't just me. A person at Immortality Institute's resveratrol forum just wrote about him a couple of days ago:
"Anthony, do you really need to take cheap shots? You don't have to suggest that a competitor is spiking their resveratrol with caffeine or other like stimulant to give an energy "feeling". You're making yourself, you company and your products look tawdry here."
http://www.imminst.org/forum/D…..37542.html
|
|
|
11:31 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
Post edited 12:01 pm – February 17, 2010 by RevGenetics
You answer is here: http://www.resforum.org/index&…..s-now#p274, and other answers to your other questions have been answered before, so playing dumb about them simply makes you look like a mentally ill person because you cannot "remember", or a marketing person for Longevinex (since you keep explaining how smart you are with leading questions, etc). Either one, turns off folks from coming to the forum.
The whole reason to have a forum is to ask questions from Dr. B and Dr. Sinclair… your posts always (and I mean always) make these two people seriously stop answering questions. It's no wonder this forum has no activity and you were banned twice from other boards, people get sick of this from you.
You asked, why I said this may never get answered, and the reason is simply because of you.
|
|
|
11:25 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
I'm staying on topic.
Again, you are just coming here to complain about Biotivia. And in the next thread , Longevinex.
You didn't answer: Don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
Why do you think this was the case?
|
|
|
11:15 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
FM2020 This thread is about Biotivia not Longevinex. The reason for the repetition is simply so that you cannot hijack it for your own purposes like you have in the past. The answer to your question has been answered on the Longevinex thread. There is not reason for you to continue asking the question, unless you want to hijack the thread. So stay on topic:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
11:05 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
I'm staying on topic.
Again, you are just coming here to complain about Biotivia. And in the next thread , Longevinex.
You didn't answer: Don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
Why do you think this was the case?
|
|
|
11:01 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
FM2020 This thread is about Biotivia not Longevinex. The reason for the repetition is simply so that you cannot hijack it for your own purposes like you have in the past. So stay on topic:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
10:51 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
I'm staying on topic.
You are just coming here to complain about Biotivia. You don't think Dr. Sinclair read your compaint the first five times??
Again, I asked you a question. Don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
Why do you think this was the case?
|
|
|
10:28 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
FM2020 This thread is about Biotivia not Longevinex. Stay on topic:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
10:23 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
I'm staying on topic.
Again, I asked you a question. Don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
Why do you think this was the case?
|
|
|
9:59 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
FM2020 no one like people who crosspost, read my response in the other thread and If you want to ask why Dr. Sinclair appears to hate Longevinex now then please post here at the correct topic: (Link). This thread is about Biotivia. Stay on topic:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
9:42 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
You don't get it. People don't like it when you put words in their mouths. Dr. Sinclair has never said a thing about hating Longevinex, yet you play cute by asking why he "appears to hate Longevinex."
pathetic.
Again, don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
|
|
|
9:34 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
Post edited 9:36 am – February 17, 2010 by RevGenetics
FM2020 If you want to ask why Dr. Sinclair appears to hate Longevinex now then please post at the correct topic (Link) Your question was answered on in a post below, and in other threads. Create a new thread for details, this thread is about Biotivia. Stay on topic:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
9:30 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
Sorry RevGenetics, I guess this is your thread to slam Biotivia…
But don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
You haven't responded to this yet.
|
|
|
9:25 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
FM2020 If you want to ask why Dr. Sinclair appears to hate Longevinex now then please post at the correct topic (Link) This topic is about Biotivia:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|
|
9:20 am February 17, 2010
| FM2020
| | | |
| Member | posts 80 |
|
|
RevGenetics,
Don't you think it is interesting that Dr Sinclair emailed the Immortality Institute in early 2007 and said that he took Longevinex at 300 mg a day for three years, and in studies on mice he used Orchid.
|
|
|
8:57 am February 17, 2010
| RevGenetics
| | | |
| Member | posts 93 |
|
|
If you want to ask why Dr. Sinclair appears to hate Longevinex now then please post here at the correct topic (Link) Scientists typically do not fool around with low purity material in studies, Orchid was necessary for purity, but expensive compared to low purity supplements:
Hi Dr. Sinclair,
Back in January 29th 2008, I once emailed you if you used Biotivia Transmax in your 2006 research because the owner of Biotivia (a person by the name of James Betz) was stating this as fact in the yahoo groups. You then emailed me back, that you did not use Biotivia, that you used Orchid Biosciences.
Since that response, James backpedaled and it appeared that Biotivia stopped that kind of false advertising for a while, however when I do a google search now… It appears that Biotivia continues to advertise that you use Transmax in research. Here is the quote:
Only 18 months ago it was announced by Dr. Sinclair at Harvard that Transmax resveratrol,a commercial extract of a red wine molecule produced by scientists at biotivia, switches on the SirT-1 anti-aging gene and prevents the normal diseases of aging.
Dr. Sinclair Apparently according to the post, you now work for Biotivia? I did not know that. (Just kidding… but it is a pretty silly post that may convince other folks)
That post is found here, and posted by a fellow called 'BioResearcher' just last sunday:
http://www.scientificamerican&…..1#comments
Since it appears that this misleading advertising continues to be used without your permission, will you be sending a cease and desist letter to Biotivia like you did to FWM Laboratories? Again that is only the latest example, I believe google has more.
Here is a google search that shows many more of the advertisement posts, over and over…
http://www.google.com/search?q…..=firefox-a
Is that over 646 bogus posts according to google? Seems like a lot to me.
Thanks
A
|
|