Forum

You must be logged in to post Login Register

Search Forums:


 






Dose again: what about 5mg/kg?

No Tags
UserPost

7:17 pm
November 17, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82


RevGenetics didn't post a reall working link, so I can't check what he is talking about. I have never typed "Prescription free" anywhere. Just more games, and on Dr. Sinclair's forum.

I think RevGenetics should apologize to Dr. Sinclair for posting his 250mg-500mg statement at the Immortality Institute out of context when responding to a consumer asking what the ideal dose might be:

Dr. Sinclair says that "the doses based on the mouse studies are 250 -500 mg per day" (From his site)
Dr. Maroon suggests between 250mg -500mg, but athletes should consider more. (From his book "The longevity Factor")
Please remember one is a Researcher, and the other a Neurosurgeon for the Steelers…

A [RevGenetics]

 

What would Dr. Sinclair make of RevGenetics' statement here? Would Dr. Sinclair think it represented what he wrote with respect to his suggested maximum of 250mg in his ebook, and in his follow up directly to RevGenetics about higher doses would be venturing into "greater unkonwn territory"?


[If I represented a vendor, why would I take the time to provide a quote heard on NPR by Dr. Olshansky encouraging people to hold off taking any resveratrol? How many vendors tell consumers to wait a year or two to take their product?]

http://www.imminst.org/forum/D…..34771.html

2:30 pm
November 17, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 7:49 pm – November 17, 2009 by RevGenetics


Mr. Holmes,

Why do you keep making things up? You do realize your actions are not making your employer look very good let alone yourself…


Folks here are smart and can read your posts on the imminst.org website, and certainly make up their own mind.


Here is the "Prescription Free" wording you mentioned in a post.

No consumer talks this way, this type of language is used only in radio, TV commercials, marketing literature and SEO folks like John… No one says "prescription free water" or "prescription free eggnog" or "prescription free green tea"… so this one statement simply makes it so obvious:

Prescription Free?

1:52 pm
November 17, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Post edited 1:56 pm – November 17, 2009 by FM2020


I think it is obvious to those reading here what is going on. Maxwatt is the moderator and a resveratrol vendor at the Immortality Institute  who banned me first as Holmes and recently as Opendoor, and is now bumping up all those quotes to help RevGenetics, who advertises there. RevGenetics has accused me for working three different resveratrol vendors when I work for none. He has quickly accused others as well when they ask about Longevinex.

I chose the name "Holmes" because I wanted to  investigate any differences between Longevinix and other brands.  Wouldn't it make sense to try to learn why a leading expert like Dr. Sinclair chose a certain brand? If I am a sock puppet, why did Maxwatt praise my posts?  Maxwatt has the power to delete posts, and he unethically announced where I was posting from.

There was no "repetition" except that I found it hard to believe Maxwatt would attempt to discredit the Longevinex article that shows Dr. Sinclair took that brand for three years. (That was when I still didn't understand the games there.) Maxwatt's name is on that thread where the director praised the scoop to the Immortality Institute.  So I would disagree and would not yield to the game playing. Why? Because I think consumers have a right to information that has been made public. Maxwatt has made a few "errors" with respect to Longevinex, so I pointed those out as well. By the way, other biochemists have pointed out Maxwatt's errors as well.

I have a recent post showing that a person who tried Longevinex while also taking blood pressure medicine, (taken at separate times) decided to discontinue. I asked others to share their experiences with respect to either Longevinex or a non blend like RevGenetics, Nature's Way, etc with respect to BP. People can get side effects from both of those brands and any others.

Those reading at Dr. Sinclair's forum need to understand the games that are played at the Immt Inst resveratrol forum. If RevGenetics wasn't in on one of the games, why would he boast:

"(Ahh nuts, this whole little conversation will probably be moved as it doesn't contribute to the knowledge in this thread… just an apparent spat.)

Cheers
A"

Again, we consumers don't like these games.

9:55 am
November 17, 2009


MaxWatt

Member

posts 5

FM2020, aka opendoor and holmes – you junp to conclusions from insufficient data,  Again.

I do not sell  resveratrol as a finished product, only to select individuals as a bulk powder.  I am not a biocemist though I have a scientiic and engineering background.  I do not play games.  I look for hard facts.  You have hardly any facts and AnthoYellny has unveiled you as a professional marketing shill. So stop playing your games.

FM2020 said:

RevGenetics is again wrong. I post from Japan. The only way Revgenetics knows this is that maxwatt, the navigator who has blocked me, and also sells resveratrol himself, has told him this.  Why would I "shield" myself when I said I am Holmes?

I have no connection with Longevinex at all, despite RevGenetics accusations.  Why not show your "proof" RevGenetics? RevGenetics has also accused me of shilling two other brands, only because they both encourage a lower dose.

I went to that forum because  I read that Dr. Sinclair was taking Longevinex for three years.

This  is the article I read:

http://www.world-science.net/e…..ratrol.htm


Here is the deal: RevGenetics advertises at Immoratlity Institute. Maxwatt is a biochemist who will play games with those who show this article. The irony is that the Immortality Inst. thought it was a scoop at the time!  But in 2009, they don't seem to want people to know Dr. Sinclair took 300mg of Longevinex a day.   The problem folks, is that this is Dr. Sinclair's forum, not their's. The games they play at that forum are not as amenable here.

We consumers don't like games.


8:59 am
November 17, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 9:54 am – November 17, 2009 by RevGenetics



There is no game, the moderator's have created rules and folks need to work within that framework.


Since you have been kicked out a couple times now, I would have expected you to have learned the rules just like I did after I initially joined the forum and was warned about. I learned the rules, and just like rules in society I make an effort to follow them unless I want to be ostracized (or kicked out). I obviously post using my real name.


Again, it is very rare that folks get kicked out. Yet… you managed to do it twice? Maybe you should post under your real name next time when you are hired to market for a company, It helps limit the types of comments you post.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't your real name John Holmes? Aren't you a PPC Executive, SEO and social media specialist? Maybe I am wrong but aren't these your companies (or companies you work for)? http://www.zoomerang.com/http://www.pixelsquare.com.au/. Heck, maybe even… http://www.guava.com/


From the looks of it, it would appear you where hired to do repetative posts for SEO purposes, to help show Adwords for the company you work for at the bottom of the imminst.org website.


Now that I have asked my questions to you, here are some facts:

09/01/2009: Looking back, it is funny I was the first to welcome you to the board as "Opendoor", while not knowing you were "Holmes": http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..p;p=344670


09/06/2009: Here ws the first time you asked about Sinclair taking 300mg, as Opendoor (You started playing your marketing game again) and where trying to create credibility with your new sock puppet account:

http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..ntry345492


09/06/2009: Here is where I first asked you to look up the arguments about Holmes, since at the time you seemed to be presenting the same arguments (of course I was right, since you were now playing your game with a new sock puppet account): http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..p;p=345966


To sum it up:

The only game I see is you asking for information as "Opendoor", that you already know about since you also posted as "Holmes" while repeating your marketing over and over.

I believe you were promoting it for SEO purposes so "Adwords" can show up at the bottom of the Imminst.org website. That is why you were being so repetitive, and mentioning your company (I even see the words "Prescription free" in one of your posts that totally sounds like a marketing slogan in the SEO advertising you were making at the forum). No consumer uses these words in regular conversation when describing a product to others…


I even mention your repetitive statements as "Holmes" here while you were playing your sock puppet game: http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..p;p=333084


How can anyone consider your statements as Holmes, Opendoor or FM2020 credible when you try to play your sock puppet games for marketing purposes?


11:10 pm
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Post edited 5:08 am – November 17, 2009 by FM2020


The navigators and Anthony [RevGenetics] have a game going. Those browsing an otherwise good resveratrol forum should know this. When someone like Crepulance or myself starts asking about Longevinex or lower dosages, and in my case showed how The Immortality Insitute was proud that they corresponded with Dr. Sinclair and learned of his Longevinex regimine, we got pushed around. In my case I was banned. 

Here is one of the games played.

 RevGenetics [Anthony Loera] will intentionally raise a fuss, and one of his friendly navigators will normally say the thread isn't going anywhere, so will shut it down. An example from just 10 days ago:

RevGenetics (Anthony) concluded his post:

(Ahh nuts, this whole little conversation will probably be moved as it doesn't contribute to the knowledge in this thread… just an apparent spat.)

Cheers
A

Here, he is boasting about that little game. (The moderators didn't move that one since it would be too obvious.)  But we consumers who are trying to find out important information do not like little games.

http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..&st=20

9:04 pm
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 9:17 pm – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics


What people are you talking about? Haven't you noticed? … there is no moderator here.


Crep crossed the line, and that is why the thread was thrown into the free speech forum. Here, there is no such thing. So Crep could call folks all sorts of names here, spam the heck out of this forum, etc. I am sure no one would moderate it. However, we would all see how mentally distrubed he would have acted. Maybe showing a little "paranoid" or possibly "psychotic" episodes.


Personally I would hope these type of folks would get help. In the meantime, you should ask yourself… why does Dr. Sinclair and his wife take more than 250mg a day, is it personal choice? Of course it is! Why else would he say that his wife takes a high dose of resveratrol?

8:50 pm
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

RevGenetics looks like he is again riling people in order to have a thread shut down. 

I can't beleve that any objective person would consider either Crepulance or me as anything other than consumers who have been trying to get solid information about resveratrol. You have accused others of shilling for companies as well. Neither Crepulance nor I appreciated how we got the run around. There are other threads were Crepulance was not treated fairly and some rightly defended him. We obviously have different personalities but both of us seem to want to get to the bottom of things and not be given the run around. People should know there is good information there, but unfortunately, the game playing as well.

I have no idea how good Crepulance's information was with respect to how much resveratrol Dr. Sinclair was taking  in late 2008. I know he was taking a bit over 300mg of Longevinex, which would correspond to 5mg/kg, from sometime in 2003 to at least late 2006. Not  sure about 2007 or 2008.

We also know that he wrote in his ebook to consider a maximum of 250mg.

In addition, we know that when you asked him, he explained that taking more than 250mg was venturing into a more uncertain area. Notice that at the time he didn't change his recommendation.

Dr. Sinclair can revise this at his site at any point he chooses. I can gurantee, however, that unlike at the ImmInst resv. forum, a "navigator" won't be able to send any undesired statements of fact to an area few will read.  

 

 

8:31 pm
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 8:46 pm – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics


Why argue about it when folks can read for themselves why Crep was believed to be a Lackey? It's not like it's not publicly recorded below for all to see:

http://www.imminst.org/forum/i…..9&st=0


Do you actually believe Crepulance, when he said that Sinclair uses 1 gram a day? He is your friend isn't he? Or… is this simply a third puppet account? Do you think he lied about Dr. Sinclair taking 1 gram a day? If so, what makes you believe he would not lie about taking RevGenetics resveratrol?


Why are we discussing Crep though?

Don't you want to know why Dr. Sinclair and his wife take more than 250mg? Or why Dr. Sinclair hasn't answered your question? Hey don't get upset and take it out on me if you don't feel good about it. Being argumentative, and not having an open mind really makes folks not want to consider talking to you.

7:39 pm
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

In regards to your claims about imminst.org, the link I posted to the Crepulance thread shows how Imminst.org forum members have reacted to the claims that other companies have used in their marketing. I suggest folks read the whole thread I linked to, to make up there own minds rather than take your word for it. I do find it entertaining at times, as Crepulance really loses his way toward the end.



RevGenetics, I'm glad you found that entertaining, but the simple truth is that Crepulance said he was using Longevinex but tried RevGenetics brand for a while and reported that he didn't have some of the same positive feelings that he had with Longevinex.  He wanted to know why, and so started posting there. Maybe it had to do with the other two compounds blended with resveratrol in Longevinex. I don't know. What I do know is that he got the run around for asking interesting questions. He saw that I got the run around as well, complained, and that thread got booted to a generic "free speech" forum where few would read it.

That is unfortunately the state of the Immt Inst resveratrol forum.

7:12 pm
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 7:24 pm – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics


The above is the latest. RevGenetics has no idea how much resveratrol Dr. Sinclair or his wife takes.


Dr. Sinclair just mentioned on twitter that his wife takes high dose of resveratrol. Just a simple fact. Your friend Crepulance… stated Sinclair takes 1 gram a day (he mentions it in the thread I linked too below).


In regards to your claims about imminst.org, the link I posted to the Crepulance thread shows how Imminst.org forum members have reacted to the claims that other companies have used in their marketing. I suggest folks read the whole thread I linked to, to make up there own minds rather than take your word for it. I do find it entertaining at times, as Crepulance really loses his way toward the end.


By the way, you keep misspelling my name. Aren't you some kind of Journalism major or grammer specialist of some sort? You continue making these obvious errors, so maybe you are not. Then again maybe I am confusing you with someone else.


Cheers

A

6:29 pm
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Do you want to discuss why Dr sinclair's dose (which is greater than 250mg) gets you upset? Or why his wife takes high doses of resveratrol? Honestly, you should not get so upset at other peoples choices.


Dr. Sinclair should understand the different tactics RevGenetics and the Immortality Institute resveratrol forum use. The above is the latest. RevGenetics has no idea how much resveratrol Dr. Sinclair or his wife takes. All we know is that he took Longevinex at around 300mg for three years according to a correspondance with the Immortality Institute in early 2007, yet I think RevGenetics would like to see the entire 5mg/kg/day thread vanish and so will start to rile either Dr. Sinclair or others.

RevGenetics is also fully aware I don't get "upset at other people's choices." I don't care if people take 0mg, 100mg, 300mg, or 1500mg a day. Why would I? What is unfortunate is that there is good information at the Immt Inst resveratrol forum, but because RevGenetics is their advertiser, posts regularly as the CEO Anthony Lorea, and the two navigators are pro high dose  as well as strongly anti-Longevinex, an honset disussion is not allowed with respect to certain important issues. People browsing that site should be aware of this.

I was naive when I first started posting there. I knew there was a potential issue if a resveratrol vendor is also the advertiser and posts regularly, but I did not realize that the navigators, who are scientists, would play the games that they did. 


3:51 pm
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 4:33 pm – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics


Crepulance is the person you seek to help you?

Folks can search on imminst.org and see why he is not taken seriously. I am not going down that road again. His posts are repetative as well, i honestly believed you and crep where the same person… however you actually hold your temper slightly better when things aren't going your way.

Do you want to discuss why Dr sinclair's dose (which is greater than 250mg) gets you upset? Or why his wife takes high doses of resveratrol? 

Honestly, you should not get so upset at other peoples choices.

3:23 pm
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Post edited 3:37 pm – November 16, 2009 by FM2020


RevGenetics, You have accusused others of the same thing, just for asking about Longevinex,  etc.

I started "Opendoor" after being banned as "Holmes" because Dr. Sinclair had mentioned in summer that he will have a series of publications that seemed extremely interesting.

Here is what one person had to say about how the resveratrol forum at the Immt Inst has been run: 

===

 
"My my my. Let's deduce, shall we. This goes out to Niner [navigator], and Anthony [RevGenetics], and the others who so quickly and childishly attacked Holmes [FM2020]. First we'll simplify for a broader perspective, then we'll dissect. Holmes mentions the word Longevin** and/or low dose resveratrol, and he is POUNCED upon immediately by navigators [mazwatt, niner]. He handles himself tactfully and without ad hominem, and yet is still suspended for three days because of his refusal to lay down to the navigator's opposing arguments, and yet again, the thread is closed… 


Whether or not holmes [FM2020] is right, his argument is completely legitimate, and for you navigators and merchants who scrape so low as to berate him and say he MUST work for a low dose res company because of his views completely deteriorates and credibility you have.…

"And as for Holmes [FM2020], I don't know or care where I started reading. What I do know is where I was reading, he was behaving civilized and tactful, and you were all antagonistic and power hungry, again banning someone regardless of the fact that they didn't use ad hominem, etc. Simply because they disagreed with you and wouldn't back down, or answer your questions the way you wanted them to. You pester his character, because you know he can't pester you back, since the second he does, you'll boot him. Give it up. I ache for the day another Res forum website opens up which is 99% Free Speech, as opposed to the 1% Free Speech you allow here. This site exists merely because of a lack of another, better run one. It's a shame, ..

http://www.imminst.org/forum/K…..30733.html

9:36 am
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 10:31 am – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics



I believe you are a competitor not a consumer.

If folks here want to believe otherwise that is their choice to do so. However there was no reason to change your name from 'Holmes' to 'Open Door' on the forum unless you were trying to start another anonymous account, with the same type of marketing 'message'.


Folks can see what that message was in your posts below as you are very repetitive:

Imminst Posts And this search on imminst… More Posts


Now, do you want to talk about your original question that Dr. Sinclair has not answered? Apparently something about it has upset you for the longest time. The posts on imminst.org lead me to believe you really want him to answer the question on the first post in this thread.


So why does Dr Sinclair's information apparently upset you so much?

Is it because he apparently takes more than 250mg as a personal choice? Or because he hasn't answered your first question in this thread?

8:58 am
November 16, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Post edited 3:03 pm – November 16, 2009 by FM2020


RevGenetics is again wrong. I post from Japan. The only way Revgenetics knows this is that maxwatt, the navigator who has blocked me, and also sells resveratrol himself, has told him this.  Why would I "shield" myself when I said I am Holmes?

I have no connection with Longevinex at all, despite RevGenetics accusations.  Why not show your "proof" RevGenetics? RevGenetics has also accused me of shilling two other brands, only because they both encourage a lower dose.

I went to that forum because  I read that Dr. Sinclair was taking Longevinex for three years.

This  is the article I read:

http://www.world-science.net/e…..ratrol.htm


Here is the deal: RevGenetics advertises at Immoratlity Institute. Maxwatt is a biochemist who will play games with those who show this article. The irony is that the Immortality Inst. thought it was a scoop at the time!  But in 2009, they don't seem to want people to know Dr. Sinclair took 300mg of Longevinex a day.   The problem folks, is that this is Dr. Sinclair's forum, not their's. The games they play at that forum are not as amenable here.

We consumers don't like games.

8:22 am
November 16, 2009


2tender

USA

Member

posts 51

A wide variety of opinions from educated, intelligent posters is always interesting. I did ask for his response guessing that it would be on the conservative side, but I didnt think it would be that low of an estimate. I think that if he had been using Resveratrol he would have had a different response. He does refer to Maxwatt as having a more in depth answer and although he is a regular poster, he does not post in the Resveratrol section often, nor probably does do much reading there. In any event, to each his own, what I find works for me may not work for any number of persons. My feelings are that anyone taking Resveratrol for the purported benefits should use at least 250 mgs as a staritng point. If a person finds it tolerable and feels it is a welcome addition to their regimen they should work their way up in dosage and see what changes, if any, are experienced. I think that between 500 mgs and 1 gram daiily is a good range for a young senior citizen like myself, provided they are not taking a variety of prescribed medications. JMO 

7:59 am
November 16, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 8:30 am – November 16, 2009 by RevGenetics



It's my understanding that the Japanese proxy server you used to shield yourself as Holmes has also been linked to a competitor's IP in emails, and is not the only electronic proof. However, since I don't want to continue arguing with you because you represent a competitor, I will walk over to you and agree with you on one thing…

Dr. Sinclair has not answered your first post on this thread.

According to your own posts he apparently takes more than 250mg.


I believe I understand that it is a personal choice to take more, because he fees safe to do so for himself. But again, I actually agree with you, Dr. Sinclair has not answered your questions yet.


As for the thread on imminst.org, you might as well copy all of the post from it, or better yet… ask folks to go and read the full thread for themselves. I believe it offers more information than you provide: http://www.imminst.org/forum/R…..34125.html


"Prophets" the person you stated was a scientist says:

not taking resveratrol currently. i never came to a firm conclusion on what comprises a 'low dose', i did spend time thinking/looking at it. i would defer to someone like maxwatt on a more thoughtful answer. But i remember coming out to something like 50 mg of resveratrol and 125 mg of quercetin (close to 1:2) ratio. i honestly can't remember off-hand which paper I based it on (i was doing it on a mg/kg from some paper).

i think there is like 1-2 mg of resveratrol per glass of red wine. so i was thinking like 500 mg of resveratrol seemed a little too much to me. that a more low dose strategy divided up and taken with meals (~4-5 hrs apart) made more sense. but thats my best guess…

i may come back to it. i've been basically drinking tons of green tea laced w/ rosemary and i get a pretty good buzz off that and just lost interest in resv.

11:22 pm
November 15, 2009


FM2020

Member

posts 82

Post edited 12:24 am – November 16, 2009 by FM2020


The biochemist wrote:

" But i remember coming out to something like 50 mg of resveratrol and 125 mg of quercetin (close to 1:2) ratio. i think there is like 1-2 mg of resveratrol per glass of red wine. so i was thinking like 500 mg of resveratrol seemed a little too much to me.

====

I can't comment on the thread since the navigator, maxwatt, banned me for criticizing the way RevGenetics used Dr. Sinclair's quote out of context. As a comsumer, I'd like full information.

But there is still the question of the famous 5mg/kg a day.

Dr. Sinclair reported to the treasurer of the Immortality Instititute in 2007 that he was taking Longevinex for three years at 320mg himself (now in 100mg capsules, not 40mg) at 5mg/kg/day, which contains  quercetin and IP6, so a "blend" [No, I don't have any ties with the company and just repeating public knowledge. ]  But presumably a heavier person such as myself would take 400mg if following Dr. Sinclair,   and a light person would take 200mg . That vendor suggests 100mg/day, and I don't know how they came to that recommendation.

8:06 pm
November 15, 2009


RevGenetics

Member

posts 93

Post edited 8:48 pm – November 15, 2009 by RevGenetics


FM2020 said:

http://www.imminst.org/forum/R…..34125.html



That is a great thread!


I would ask most people here to take a click on the link to the thread, as it is an ongoing discussion that is very interesting and in the last post, the person you say is a "scientist" defers to Maxwatt for more information as to what a low dose may be since he does not take it.


BTW:

Maxwatt at the Resveratrol Forum I believe has taken 1 gram or more of resveratrol early on, but I think he may currently be taking 500mg. Most folks can easily go to the forum, and ask him. I am sure he will help as he has been very knowledgable about the subject, and I have even asked him questions myself about resveratrol at times.

I highly reccomend him when stumped about a question dealing with resveratrol. Or… simply search through his posts for any answers he has posted previously.


Cheers everyone!

No Tags